Guiding inspections to compliance
Fire districts rely on third-party contractors to inspect the fire protection systems in the buildings they serve. But today, those inspections can arrive from dozens of contractors in dozens of different formats, usually as PDFs that someone has to open, read, and interpret.
Compliance Shepherd changes that.
Contractors submit inspections through one standardized set of digital forms. Instead of receiving a document that someone has to read, your district receives structured inspection data.
See what passed. See what failed. Know what is overdue, all without opening a single report.
Compliance Shepherd can automatically notify building owners about overdue inspections, while giving your team the ability to search inspections, run reports, track compliance, and export the data whenever you need it.
No more digging through PDFs. No more manually interpreting reports.
The power starts with standardization.
When every contractor submits the same information in the same format, inspections become more than documents stored in a system. They become data your district can actually use.
That’s the difference between a system that stores inspection reports and one that understands them.
The company that just tested the building’s fire alarm, sprinklers, extinguishers or kitchen hood answers that system’s checks on a phone or a laptop. They use the same form every time, in every district, by every inspector.
The form is saved as rows in the database AND as a sealed saved PDF to capture the inspection as it was filed.
Compliant, deficient and overdue statuses are recorded.
Building owners are notified of outcomes without district intervention.
The forms are fully customizable and easy to change as new requirements are made. Administrators can pick what causes a deficiency and what is only an observation. Reviews are customizable too. Fire districts can choose to put a person in the loop on every inspection, on a portion of them, or let the system handle it.
| Typically today | Compliance Shepherd | |
|---|---|---|
| What the district pays | Potentially a license, per seat or per building | Nothing, ever |
| What the district earns | Nothing | A surcharge you set, on every filing |
| What a contractor pays per report | $37 to $75 | $5 for the structured form |
| What arrives on your side | A PDF somebody has to open | Structured data: 232 checks, each a row |
| Changing what gets inspected | A change request, if it is offered at all | Your own screen, this afternoon |
| Buildings nobody has filed against | Invisible, because the index is its participants | Seeded from county data, so the gap is visible |
| Who decides what the public sees | The vendor’s design | You, at three levels, default none |
The guided demo is the real software running against a fire district we invented for it. It is not a video and not a mock-up. Open your building list, read a sealed report, set a surcharge, change what a check means, file an inspection. Press anything you like: it is yours to explore, and nothing is saved.
Nothing to your district, $5 to the contractor for a structured filing, $55 for an uploaded non Compliance Shepherd PDF, and $0 for a correction. On top of that, whatever surcharge you set is collected with our fee and tracked to your district.
The whole pricing model, in one page, including how we make money →